As a Committed Capitalist, But Universal Medicare Is the Best Solution for American Healthcare

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of our government's military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.

Christopher Peterson
Christopher Peterson

Astrophysicist and science communicator passionate about making space accessible through engaging stories and research.