🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its activities following with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.